Contact Information

Dr. Kristopher L. Cannon
Office: 126 Holmes Hall
Mailbox: Media & Screen Studies Program, 114 Holmes Hall
E-Mail: k.cannon [at] neu.edu (please allow 24 hours for response)
Office Hours: MWR: 1:45-2:45pm; or, by appointment (please e-mail first).

[divider_line type=”divider_line”]

Useful Links

Amazon Student: If you order from Amazon, signing up for Amazon Student qualifies you for a free trial of Amazon Prime, which includes free 2-day shipping and access to Amazon Instant movie streaming. You can choose to renew Amazon Prime for a discounted rate after the initial, free trial.

Dropbox: A free account includes 2GB of storage. You will occasionally notice that I link to files stored through this service.

Course Attendance & Participation (10%, 100 pts.)

[list style=”orb” color=”grey-lite”]

  • Attendance in class and for in-class screenings.
  • Preparation for class, in addition to the quantity and quality of your contribution to class discussions.
  • Any in-class assignments are included within this grade.

[/list]

2 Television Journals (20%, 200 pts.) DUE: 10/16 & 11/24

[list style=”orb” color=”grey-lite”]

  • The purpose of this assignment is to help you build the skill set of thinking critically about television and television viewership through various analytical lenses. Over the course of the semester you are expected to view an episode from ten different television series. You may view network or cable programs. You may choose to watch programs when they air during regularly scheduled programming, on DVR, on a compilation DVD, or from a streaming service such as Netflix, Hulu, or TV Network websites.
  • Each journal is comprised of 5 entries (worth 20pts. each) and each entry requires:
    • A synopsis of information about the episode you viewed, including information about the series title, episode name/number, and method of access/viewing. This information is detailed in the TV Journal format handout here: PDF or DOC
    • 250-400 words of critical analysis about the episode you viewed. This analysis should draw from the readings to interrogate issues like (but not limited to) narrative structure, aesthetic style, genre, advertising, and/or representations of identity categories.

[/list]

On-Going Group Project (20%, 200 pts.)

[list style=”orb” color=”grey-lite”]

  • You will be in groups of 3-4 students.
  • Each group will give three 10-15 minute presentations during the semester. Each group member is expected to speak during the presentation. Groups should plan and rehearse their presentations before they are delivered in class.
  • Each group will choose a television network/channel to analyze for the duration of the semester. Each presentation will require the group to examine specific features of the network. The group will be asked to summarize how their network operates by comparing personal engagements with contemporary journalistic sources (such as Variety, The Hollywood Reporter, Salon, The New York Times, etc.) and other online media industry publications (including online TV studies journals like FlowTV or Antenna, blogs like The Futon Critic, or social media like Twitter).
  • Groups are encouraged to include audio/visual materials (e.g. clips, images) to illustrate main points. NOTE: Audio/visual materials should never comprise the majority of the presentation but should be used as support for information in your presentation (e.g. 1-minute of time in a video-clip deserves at least 3-4 minutes of analysis/explanation and, thus, a 3-minute clip would be the maximum you should include in a 15-minute presentation).
  • Each group will also be required to submit a 300 to 400-word research summary on Blackboard. While these summaries should briefly address the topics you addressed in your presentation, their main purpose is to summarize where you located the information presented in class. [In Presentation #1, for example, you would include a statement about strategies for program lineups and another statement about network marketing strategies. Each of these statements should be connected with various citations based upon the websites or journalistic resources used to acquire the information.]

[/list]

Presentation #1 (DUE 9/29): Address the programming and advertising strategies of the network/channel. Your group should include information about the types of programs aired on the network/channel, strategies for programming line-ups (such as days of the week particular programs air and/or how the network/channel “counter-programs” against other networks). You group should also include information about advertisement and marketing strategies, which would include information about the target demographic(s) of the network, how the channel targets their perceived audience(s), and information about network ratings.

Presentation #2 (DUE 11/3): Address the stylistic strategies of the network. You should address the concepts of aesthetics and representation and, otherwise, this presentation can be accomplished in a number of ways: you can address aesthetic elements from individual programs and if/how these elements connect with the brand image the network/channel constructs; you can consider how the aesthetic/stylistic properties of programs contribute to representations of identities and how these representations do (or do not) connect with the network/channel target audience; etc.

Presentation # 3 (DUE 12/1): Address the online/paratextual strategies of the network. Be sure to include information about how the network/channel aims to keep audiences engaged while watching the program and/or beyond viewing the program. These strategies may include paratextual strategies such as additional content on the network/channel website, encouraging live tweeting or texting, use of mobile phone/tablet applications, etc.

Midterm Exam (20%, 200 pts.) IN CLASS on 10/20

[list style=”orb” color=”grey-lite”]

  • An essay format in-class exam on definitions/descriptions of concepts.
  • 10 concepts will be provided in advance; 5 will be selected to appear on the exam.
  • You need to answer all 5 questions by 1) defining the concept based on course readings and lectures, and 2) explaining how the concept operates by making reference to a specific screening or clip seen in class.
  • No make-up exams are allowed without pre-approval.

[/list]

Final Paper Proposal (5%, 50 pts.) DUE: 11/10

[list style=”orb” color=”grey-lite”]

  • Note: You must meet with me during office hours before November 7th to receive approval for your paper topic. I will help you focus your interests during this meeting but will not write a research question for you. This assignment constitutes a first review/draft on your topic. Make it as strong as you can, so that I can provide adequate feedback for you to incorporate in your final paper. I will not read paper proposals that have not been previously approved by me and, thus, results in less feedback to incorporate in your final paper.
  • For your proposal:
    • You will identify a research question to ask based on a topic of your choosing (1-2 sentences).
    • You will summarize your approach to answer this question, indicating the subject matter or course concepts/topics you will address in your paper. (2-3 paragraphs)
    • You will then provide critical analyses to illustrate either 1) what prompted your research question, or 2) how you will begin to answer your research question. (at least 800-1000 words).

[/list]

Final Paper (25%, 250 pts.) DUE: 12/8 by 12noon

[list style=”orb” color=”grey-lite”]

  • A 5-7 page research paper expanding upon your final paper proposal.
  • Submission/format instructions:
    • Length: 1300-2100 words (excluding words in your bibliography).
    • File Format: PDF
    • PDF File Name: “Last Name First Name – Assignment Name” (e.g. “Cannon Kris – Final Paper”)
    • Cover Page, including pertinent details.
  • Your paper should do the following:
    • Construct an argument based on the research question(s) you addressed in your proposal.
    • Support your argument with textual/critical analysis.
    • Incorporate a minimum of 5 SCHOLARLY sources. At least one source should be located outside of course readings. You can find additional academic/scholarly at the NEU library and by using their website to search for journal articles in databases like Academic Search Premier or JSTOR.
    • Provide proper citations based upon one uniform style (e.g. MLA, APA, Chicago, etc.). Any academic citation style should include:
      • In-text citations (name/page or footnotes) to designate where to locate each source you quote or paraphrase.
      • A bibliography, listing all sources used in your paper.

[/list]

Grade Breakdown & Criteria

A: 94-100% (940-1000pts)
A-: 90-93%
B+: 87-89%
B: 84-86%

B-: 80-83%
C+: 77-79%
C: 74-76%
C-: 70-73%

D+: 67-69%
D: 64-66%
D-: 60-63%
F: Below 60%

“A” indicates truly exceptional work, which demonstrates command of concepts and theories, presenting them in a well-argued and logically structured manner. “A” work significantly surpasses the expectations of the assignment, is free of spelling and grammatical errors, and does not merely address the questions through a repetition of course material or lectures. It provides fresh, creative, and original perspectives with a unique voice, offering connections between the topic and broader issues and contexts. Superior research skills are demonstrated with relevant citations and quotations advancing the argument.

“B” indicates above-average work that clearly achieves the goals of the assignment, providing smart and solid analyses with thoughtful and organized arguments I expect any diligent student to be able to produce. “B” work offers some originality, contains few (if any) typos, spelling errors, or grammatical mistakes, and addresses most questions directly by citing specific materials from the texts and lectures to illustrate points being made.

“C” indicates meets the course requirements in an adequate fashion by addressing the questions without sufficient engagement with materials from texts or lectures. “C” work tends to recycle examples from discussion without providing connections to the analysis, contains unfocused, uncritical, or insufficiently supported arguments, and typically contains acceptable but awkward prose with various typos, spelling errors or poorly structured sentences that result in vague arguments.

“D” indicates work that is off-topic, poorly written, disorganized and, instead of the course materials, utilizes “personal experience” or inapplicable research materials or support (such as readings obviously applicable in other subjects or classes). In other words, the assignment shows little to no evidence that a student was paying attention in class, does not incorporate materials used in course readings or class discussion, and sounds like a summary or review of materials rather than critically engaged analyses. This type of work may also fall short or far exceed the page limits or time constraints for the assignment and typically contain many spelling and grammatical errors and/or show no signs of being proofread.

“F” indicates work that dramatically fails to meet the goals and expectations of the course. “F” work is incoherent, plagiarized, and/or never submitted.